Readings & Reflections · No. 4
Already Here, Already Bright
March 2026 — from the Dzogchen tradition, Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche
The nature of mind is empty and cognizant. These two qualities are not separate things — they are one. Emptiness without cognizance would be like dead space, vacant and unknowing. Cognizance without emptiness would be a fixed thing, a solid knower caught inside its own knowing. The unity of the two is rigpa, the natural state. It is always present. It is not made by practice. It is what you are before practice begins.
— Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche (1920–1996), in the spirit of his teaching in Rainbow Painting and As It Is, trans. Erik Pema Kunsang (Rangjung Yeshe Publications)
The three traditions visited here so far — Advaita Vedanta, Zen, and now Dzogchen — are pointing at the same thing. But each adds an angle the others leave less explicit.
Nisargadatta's move was subtraction: awareness before consciousness, the impersonal presence prior to any particular experience. The direction is clear and useful. But "awareness" can slip, depending on how it lands, toward sounding like a very quiet, empty space — still, undifferentiated, almost absent.
Huang Po stripped away the categories: not green or yellow, not old or new, not large or small. After removing everything the mind might grab, the pointing was sudden — it is that which you see before you. And then the warning: reasoning about it falls into error the moment it begins.
Tulku Urgyen holds both registers at once. Rigpa is empty — no fixed, locatable object, no thing you can point at — but it is also cognizant. Aware. Bright. Not a blank, not an absence, but a luminous openness that is itself the knowing.
The distinction carries weight because the word emptiness is available to be misread.
Someone new to this territory might hear "the self is empty" and conclude: so nothing is really here, nothing matters, it's all just void. That confusion — taking the negation without the affirmation — is one of the more common wrong turns in non-dual inquiry. Dzogchen's insistence on cognizance closes that gap. The emptiness is not inert. It is the knowing itself.
The Tibetan word rigpa (རིག་པ) is related to the verb "to know." Awareness as knowing. In Dzogchen instruction, this quality is sometimes described as ösel, clear light — present even in deep dreamless sleep, recognized in practice not as something produced but as what's already been here throughout.
That phrase — "not made by practice" — is the crucial one. Practice in this framework is not a means of constructing the natural state; it is a way of learning to stop obscuring it. The Dzogchen instruction is not "do this to get there" but rather something like: notice that the one doing the getting is itself a movement within what's already arrived.
What would it mean to take "cognizant" seriously right now?
Not to think about awareness as an object, but to notice that reading these words is itself a case of knowing — not a thought arising in awareness as if in a container, but the knowing occurring as the awareness, the two not separate.
Empty: nothing you can locate or hold.
Cognizant: already knowing, already bright.
Nisargadatta called it the sense of presence. Huang Po said: already before you. Tulku Urgyen says: empty and cognizant, and the two are not separate.
The word changes. The gesture is the same.
← Previous: What You See Before You (Huang Po) Next: What Was Never Lost (Abhinavagupta) →